Naoko Eto vs Amber Maatman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eto vs Maatman analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoko Eto vs Amber Maatman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Eto 1 - 0 Maatman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eto has won 42.42% of points on their second serve, while Maatman has won 43.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eto, in recent form, has won 58.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maatman has won 38.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.73% and 29.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eto has saved 47.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maatman has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eto has won 38.46% of matches played (W/L 10/ 16), with Maatman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eto has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 16% (W/L 12/ 62). Maatman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Eto has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.18% of matches (W/L 7/ 10), where as Maatman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eto winning 1 times and Maatman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eto winning 2 and Maatman winning 0. The last match between Eto and Maatman was at the W15 Wanfercee-Baulet, 20-08-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Naoko Eto getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eto and Maatman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eto winning 0 times and Maatman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eto winning 0, and Maatman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eto has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Maatman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eto has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maatman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eto has converted 44.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maatman has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Naoko Eto
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
853
Rank
843
High
39
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
Amber Maatman
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
17% (38-183)
Career Total W/L
8% (1-12)
38% (3-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naoko Eto | Amber Maatman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 0 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoko Eto | Amber Maatman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) | 0% (0/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (58/81) | 32% (6/13) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.01 | 0 |
Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 17 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (102/163) | 74% (46/62) |
1st Serve W% | 51% (52/102) | 46% (21/46) |
2nd Serve W% | 39% (24/61) | 44% (7/16) |
BPs Won% Total | 63% (12/19) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (77/160) | 33% (20/60) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Naoko Eto Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Bronte Murgett
Player
Naoko Eto
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoko Eto
Player
Sara-Maria Calmuschi
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Isabella Marton
Player
Naoko Eto
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carolann Delaunay
Player
Naoko Eto
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoko Eto
Player
Yanni Liu
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H |
view more
Amber Maatman Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Yelena Lebeau
Player
Amber Maatman
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Amber Maatman
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
88%
(
28 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Arianna Zucchini
Player
Amber Maatman
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more